Salvador Caballero-Hernandez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Filing
920100203
Case: 09-60341
Document: 00511019853
Page: 1
Date Filed: 02/03/2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED
No. 09-60341 Summary Calendar February 3, 2010 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
SALVADOR CABALLERO-HERNANDEZ, Petitioner v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent
Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A094-953-167
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Salvador Cabellero-Hernandez petitions this court for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision summarily affirming the Immigration Judge's ("IJ") order denying his application for cancellation of removal pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1). Petitioner contests the merits of the IJ's determination that he was statutorily ineligible for cancellation of removal because he failed to
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 09-60341
Document: 00511019853
Page: 2
Date Filed: 02/03/2010
No. 09-60341 demonstrate the requisite hardship. Further, Petitioner challenges the
constitutional basis of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1229b(b) and 1252(a)(2)(B). "This court lacks jurisdiction to review the IJ's [discretionary] hardship determination" under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1). Rueda v. Ashcroft, 380 F.3d 831, 831 (2004). Petitioner's remaining constitutional claims are meritless.
Petitioner raises a due process challenge to 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(2) on behalf of his American children, but "[l]egal orders of deportation to their parents do not violate any constitutional right of citizen children . . . ." Gonzalez-Cuevas v. INS, 515 F.2d 1222, 1224 (5th Cir. 1975). Petitioner next claims that
§ 1252(a)(2)(B) violates the Administrative Procedure Act ("APA"), but "the APA does not apply to deportation hearings under [the Immigration and Nationality Act]." Rivera-Cruz v. INS, 948 F.2d 962, 967 n.5 (5th Cir. 1992). For these reasons, petition for review is DENIED.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?