USA v. Claude Johnson

Filing 920100923

Opinion

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United StateshCourt of Appeals Fift Circuit FILED No. 09-60956 c/w No. 09-60957 Summary Calendar September 23, 2010 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. CLAUDE CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 2:03-CR-29-1 USDC No. 2:98-CR-18-1 Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing his sentences following the revocation of supervised release, Claude Christopher Johnson presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Brown, 920 F.2d 1212, 1216-17 (5th Cir. 1991), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Candia, 454 F.3d 468, 472-73 (5th Cir. 2006), Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * No. 09-60956 c/w No. 09-60957 which held that a district court may order a term of imprisonment to run consecutively with an unimposed state sentence. To the extent that Johnson argues that the district court erred in ordering that his revocation sentences run consecutively with a federal sentence imposed in any prosecution relating to the criminal conduct in the matter, any such error was rendered harmless or moot. Johnson's subsequently imposed 120-month sentence following his guilty plea to theft of firearms from a licensed firearm dealer was ordered to run concurrently with his revocation sentences. See United States v. Ahmed, 324 F.3d 368, 374 (5th Cir. 2003); Rocky v. King, 900 F.2d 864, 867 (5th Cir. 1990); United States v. Quintana-Gomez, 521 F.3d 495, 497-98 (5th Cir. 2008). The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Government's alternative motion for an extension of time is DENIED. The 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?