Kathleen Ansley, et al v. HealthMarkets, Inc., et al
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [10-10142 Reversed and Remanded] Judge: EHJ , Judge: FPB , Judge: SA Mandate pull date is 03/25/2011 [10-10142]
Kathleen Ansley, et al v. HealthMarkets, Inc., et al Case: 10-10142 Document:
00511402769 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/04/2011
Doc. 0 Att. 2
United States Court of Appeals
FIFTH C IR C U IT O FFIC E O F TH E C LER K LYLE W . C A YC E C LER K TEL. 504-310-7700 600 S. M A ESTR I PLA C E NEW O R LEA N S, LA 70130
March 04, 2011 MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL OR PARTIES LISTED BELOW Regarding: Fifth Circuit Statement on Petitions for Rehearing or Rehearing En Banc
No. 10-10142, Kathleen Ansley v. HealthMarkets, Inc. USDC No. 3:08-CV-1432 --------------------------------------------------Enclosed is a copy of the court's decision. The court has entered judgment under FED . R. APP . P. 36. (However, the opinion may yet contain typographical or printing errors which are subject to correction.) FED. R. APP. P. 39 through 41, and 5TH CIR . RULES 35, 39, and 41 govern costs, rehearings, and mandates. 5TH CIR . RULES 35 and 40 require you to attach to your petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc an unmarked copy of the court's opinion or order. Please read carefully the Internal Operating Procedures (IOP's) following FED . R. APP . P. 40 and 5TH CIR . R. 35 for a discussion of when a rehearing may be appropriate, the legal standards applied and sanctions which may be imposed if you make a nonmeritorious petition for rehearing en banc. Direct Criminal Appeals. 5TH CIR . R. 41 provides that a motion for a stay of mandate under FED . R. APP . P. 41 will not be granted simply upon request. The petition must set forth good cause for a stay or clearly demonstrate that a substantial question will be presented to the Supreme Court. Otherwise, this court may deny the motion and issue the mandate immediately. Pro Se Cases. If you were unsuccessful in the district court and/or on appeal, and are considering filing a petition for certiorari in the United States Supreme Court, you do not need to file a motion for stay of mandate under FED . R. APP . P. 41. The issuance of the mandate does not affect the time, or your right, to file with the Supreme Court. Thr judgment entered provides that plaintiffs-appellees pay to defendants-appellants the costs on appeal. Sincerely, LYLE W. CAYCE, Clerk
By:_________________________ Joseph M. Armato, Deputy Clerk 504-310-7651
Case: 10-10142 Document: 00511402769 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/04/2011
Enclosures Mr. Ms. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Richard Todd Archibald Kathleen H. Dooley Dwight M. Francis Garon Ray Horton Andrew George Jubinsky Ben C Martin Steven A. Meckler Stacy R. Obenhaus Jerome P. Trehy Jr. Raymond E. Walker
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?