Villas at Parkside Partners, et al v. City of Farmers Branch Texa

Filing

PUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [10-10751 Affirmed ] Judge: TMR, concurring in the judgment, joined by JEG , Judge: JLD, concurring, joined by TMR, ECP, JEG, Judge: PRO, concurring in part and dissenting in part, Judge: SAH, Authoring, joined by CES, WED, LHS and CH, SAH, specially concurring , Judge: EHJ and JWE dissenting, joined by EGJ, JES and EBC. Mandate pull date is 08/12/2013 [10-10751]

Case: 10-10751

Document: 00512316703

Page: 1

Date Filed: 07/22/2013

United States Court of Appeals
FIFTH CIRCUIT
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
LYLE W. CAYCE
CLERK

TEL. [phone]
600 S. MAESTRI PLACE
NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130

July 22, 2013
MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL OR PARTIES LISTED BELOW
Regarding:

Fifth Circuit Statement on Petitions for Rehearing or
Rehearing En Banc

No. 10-10751, Villas at Parkside Partners, et al v. City of
Farmers Branch Texas
USDC No. 3:08-CV-1551
USDC No. 3:08-CV-1615
--------------------------------------------------Enclosed is a copy of the court's decision.
The court has
entered judgment under FED. R. APP. P. 36. (However, the opinion
may yet contain typographical or printing errors which are
subject to correction.)
FED. R. APP. P. 39 through 41, and 5TH CIR. RULES 35, 39, and 41
govern costs, rehearings, and mandates. 5TH CIR. RULES 35 and 40
require you to attach to your petition for panel rehearing or
rehearing en banc an unmarked copy of the court's opinion or
order. Please read carefully the Internal Operating Procedures
(IOP's) following FED. R. APP. P. 40 and 5TH CIR. R. 35 for a
discussion of when a rehearing may be appropriate, the legal
standards applied and sanctions which may be imposed if you make
a nonmeritorious petition for rehearing en banc.
Direct Criminal Appeals.
5TH CIR. R. 41 provides that a motion
for a stay of mandate under FED. R. APP. P. 41 will not be
granted simply upon request.
The petition must set forth good
cause for a stay or clearly demonstrate that a substantial
question will be presented to the Supreme Court. Otherwise, this
court may deny the motion and issue the mandate immediately.
Pro Se Cases.
If you were unsuccessful in the district court
and/or on appeal, and are considering filing a petition for
certiorari in the United States Supreme Court, you do not need to
file a motion for stay of mandate under FED. R. APP. P. 41. The
issuance of the mandate does not affect the time, or your right,
to file with the Supreme Court.
The judgment entered provides that defendant-appellant pay to
plaintiffs-appellees the costs on appeal.

Case: 10-10751

Document: 00512316703

Page: 2

Date Filed: 07/22/2013

Sincerely,
LYLE W. CAYCE, Clerk

By:_________________________
Debbie T. Graham, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure(s)
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Ms.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Dr.
Ms.
Ms.
Mr.
Ms.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Morris J. Baller
Charles Dunham Biles
William A. Brewer III
R David Broiles
Nicolas Chavez
Rebecca McNeill Couto da Silva
Omar C. Jadwat
Lawrence John Joseph
Peter Michael Jung
Kris William Kobach
Jennifer C. Newell
Nina Perales
James Stephen Renard
Rebecca L. Robertson
Jeffrey Eric Sandberg
Benjamin M. Shultz
Carlos Ramon Soltero
Daniel Bentele Hahs Tenny
Jack George Breffney Ternan