USA v. Pedro Belleza


UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [10-20123 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: TMR , Judge: JLD , Judge: EBC Mandate pull date is 04/26/2011 for Appellant Pedro Lujan Belleza; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Attorney Ms. Laura Fletcher Leavitt for Appellant Mr. Pedro Lujan Belleza [6565174-2] [10-20123]

Download PDF
Case: 10-20123 Document: 00511434756 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/05/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED No. 10-20123 Summary Calendar April 5, 2011 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. PEDRO LUJAN BELLEZA, also known as Pedro Belleia Lujan, also known as Pedro Balleza Lujan, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:09-CR-387-1 Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Pedro Lujan Belleza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, ___ F.3d ___, No. 09-41281, 2011 WL 309173 (5th Cir. Jan. 31, 2011). Lujan Belleza has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record referenced therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal * Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. Case: 10-20123 Document: 00511434756 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/05/2011 No. 10-20123 presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?