USA v. Jorge Hernandez
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [10-20207 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: JES , Judge: JLD , Judge: EBC Mandate pull date is 11/16/2010 for Appellant Jorge Manuel Camarena Hernandez; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Attorney Ms. Marjorie A Meyers for Appellant Mr. Jorge Manuel Camarena Hernandez [6555939-2] [10-20207]
USA v. Jorge Hernandeze: 10-20207 Cas
Document: 00511274953 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/26/2010
Doc. 0
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED
N o . 10-20207 C o n fe r e n c e Calendar October 26, 2010 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk
U N IT E D STATES OF AMERICA, P la in t if f -A p p e lle e v. J O R G E MANUEL CAMARENA HERNANDEZ, also known as Jorge Camarena, a ls o known as Jorge Camarena Hernandez, also known as Jorge Manuel C a m a r e n a -H e r n a n d e z, D e fe n d a n t -A p p e lla n t
A p p e a l from the United States District Court fo r the Southern District of Texas U S D C No. 4:09-CR-581-1
B e fo r e SMITH, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. P E R CURIAM:* T h e Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jorge Manuel C a m a r e n a Hernandez (Camarena) has moved for leave to withdraw and has file d a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Camarena has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and c o u n s e l's brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Dockets.Justia.com
Case: 10-20207 Document: 00511274953 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/26/2010 No. 10-20207 m o t io n for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further r e s p o n s ib ilit ie s herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?