Wanda Bellow v. Michael Astrue, Commissioner

Filing 920101013

Opinion

Download PDF
Case: 10-30026 Document: 00511260691 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/12/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED October 12, 2010 No. 10-30026 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk WANDA M. BELLOW, Plaintiff­Appellant v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant­Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 6:06-CV-920 Before WIENER, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Wanda M. Bellow appeals the Commissioner of Social Security's denial of her application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits. On review, "we consider only whether the Commissioner applied the proper legal standards and whether substantial evidence in the record supports the decision to deny benefits." Audler v. Astrue, 501 F.3d 446, 447 (5th Cir. 2007); see 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). As Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay's thorough Supplemental Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. * Case: 10-30026 Document: 00511260691 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/12/2010 No. 10-30026 Report and Recommendation explained, see Bellow v. Astrue, No. 2:06-cv-920, slip op. (W.D. La. Sept. 30, 2009), the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") applied the proper legal standards, and the documentation provided by Bellow in support of her contention that she suffered from depression did not make necessary a consultative psychological or psychiatric examination in order to fully develop the record. There is substantial evidence to support the Commissioner's conclusion that Bellow is not disabled. AFFIRMED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?