USA v. Javier Castillo-Ortiz

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [10-40041 Dismissed as frivolous ] Judge: WED , Judge: JES , Judge: LHS Mandate pull date is 11/03/2010 for Appellant Javier Castillo-Ortiz; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Attorney Mr. Timothy William Crooks for Appellant Mr. Javier Castillo-Ortiz [6541233-2] [10-40041]

Download PDF
USA v. Javier Castillo-Ortiz Doc. 0 Case: 10-40041 Document: 00511261867 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/13/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED N o . 10-40041 S u m m a r y Calendar October 13, 2010 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk U N IT E D STATES OF AMERICA, P la in t if f -A p p e lle e v. J A V IE R CASTILLO-ORTIZ, also known as Jose Perez-Castillo, also known as J a v ie r Castillo-Cisneros, D e fe n d a n t -A p p e lla n t A p p e a l from the United States District Court fo r the Southern District of Texas U S D C No.7:09-CR-1282-1 B e fo r e DAVIS, SMITH and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. P E R CURIAM:* T h e Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Javier Castillo-Ortiz h a s moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v . California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Castillo has filed a response. Our in d e p e n d e n t review of the record, counsel's brief, and Castillo's response d is c lo s e s no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion for Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-40041 Document: 00511261867 Page: 2 No. 10-40041 Date Filed: 10/13/2010 le a v e to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities h e r e in , and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?