USA v. Marco Alvarez-Acosta
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [10-40301 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: WED , Judge: JES , Judge: LHS. Mandate pull date is 12/09/2010 for Appellant Marco Antonio Alvarez-Acosta; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Attorney Ms. Marjorie A Meyers for Appellant Mr. Marco Antonio Alvarez-Acosta [6567547-2] [10-40301]
USA v. Marco Alvarez-Acosta Case: 10-40301
Document: 00511298398 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/18/2010
Doc. 0
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED
N o . 10-40301 S u m m a r y Calendar November 18, 2010 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk
U N IT E D STATES OF AMERICA, P la in t if f -A p p e lle e , versu s M A R C O ANTONIO ALVAREZ-ACOSTA, Also Known as Antonio Alvarez-Acosta, D e fe n d a n t -A p p e lla n t .
A p p e a l from the United States District Court fo r the Southern District of Texas U S D C No. 7:09-CR-103-1
B e fo r e DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. P E R CURIAM:*
T h e Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Marco Antonio Alvar-
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Dockets.Justia.com
Case: 10-40301 Document: 00511298398 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/18/2010 No. 10-40301 e z -A c o s t a has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance w it h Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Alvarez-Acosta has not filed a r e s p o n s e . Our independent review of the record and counsel's brief discloses no n o n fr iv o lo u s issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withd r a w is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and t h e APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?