USA v. Romont Robbins, Jr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [10-40389 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: EGJ , Judge: PRO , Judge: CH Mandate pull date is 05/10/2011 for Appellant Romont Lachea Robbins Jr.; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Attorney Mr. Frank Warren Henderson, Esq. for Appellant Mr. Romont Lachea Robbins, Jr. [6633404-2] [10-40389]

Download PDF
Case: 10-40389 Document: 00511450271 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/19/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED No. 10-40389 Conference Calendar April 19, 2011 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ROMONT LACHEA ROBBINS, JR., Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:09-CR-140-1 Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Romont Lachea Robbins, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Robbins has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is * Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. Case: 10-40389 Document: 00511450271 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/19/2011 No. 10-40389 GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?