USA v. Erardo Sanchez


UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [10-40844 Dismissed as Frivolous10-40850 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: EHJ , Judge: CES , Judge: LHS Mandate pull date is 07/12/2011 for Appellant Erardo Sanchez; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Ms. Margaret Christina Ling [6708112-2] [10-40844, 10-40850]

Download PDF
Case: 10-40844 Document: 00511515361 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED June 21, 2011 No. 10-40844 c/w No. 10-40850 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ERARDO SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:05-CR-272-1 USDC No. 2:10-CR-268-1 Before JONES, Chief Judge, and STEWART and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Erardo Sanchez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Sanchez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. * We concur with Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. Case: 10-40844 Document: 00511515361 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/21/2011 No. 10-40844 c/w No. 10-40850 counsel’s assessment that the appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?