USA v. Erardo Sanchez
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [10-40844 Dismissed as Frivolous10-40850 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: EHJ , Judge: CES , Judge: LHS Mandate pull date is 07/12/2011 for Appellant Erardo Sanchez; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Ms. Margaret Christina Ling [6708112-2] [10-40844, 10-40850]
Case: 10-40844
Document: 00511515361
Page: 1
Date Filed: 06/21/2011
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Fifth Circuit
FILED
June 21, 2011
No. 10-40844
c/w No. 10-40850
Conference Calendar
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
ERARDO SANCHEZ,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:05-CR-272-1
USDC No. 2:10-CR-268-1
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and STEWART and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Erardo Sanchez has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Sanchez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein.
*
We concur with
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 10-40844
Document: 00511515361
Page: 2
Date Filed: 06/21/2011
No. 10-40844
c/w No. 10-40850
counsel’s assessment that the appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEALS ARE
DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?