Vera Walker v. East Central Planning

Filing 920100928

Opinion

Case: 10-60134

Document: 00511245338

Page: 1

Date Filed: 09/27/2010

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED
September 27, 2010 N o . 10-60134 S u m m a r y Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk

V E R A M. WALKER P la in t iff - Appellant v. E A S T CENTRAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, INC. D e fe n d a n t - Appellee

A p p e a l from the United States District Court fo r the Southern District of Mississippi

B e fo r e REAVLEY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. P E R CURIAM:* F e d e r a l courts are limited in their authority to consider the merits of c o n t r o v e r s ie s or order relief from unfair conduct unless given the jurisdiction to d o so by law. That law comes from Congress and prior court decisions. The d is t r ic t court has explained accurately by the order of January 11, 2010, why the P la in t iff has failed to present to the court sufficient admissible evidence to allow it to proceed with the claim that there has been a violation of federal statutes or

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

*

Case: 10-60134

Document: 00511245338

Page: 2

Date Filed: 09/27/2010

No. No. 10-60134 S u m m a r y Calendar s t a t e tort law. Plaintiff in her brief to this court points to nothing in the record t o affect the district court's judgment. Consequently, the judgment must be a ffir m e d . A F F IR M E D .

2