USA v. Hermelindo Segundo
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [11-20493 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: EHJ , Judge: EGJ , Judge: JES Mandate pull date is 05/08/2012 for Appellant Hermelindo Segundo; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Timothy William Crooks [6961689-2] [11-20493]
Case: 11-20493
Document: 00511824521
Page: 1
Date Filed: 04/17/2012
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Fifth Circuit
FILED
No. 11-20493
Conference Calendar
April 17, 2012
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
HERMELINDO SEGUNDO, also known as Hermelindo Melo Segundo, also
known as Hermelindo Melo Marquez Segundo, also known as Hermelindo Melo
Marq Segundo,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:11-CR-94-1
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Hermelindo Segundo
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Segundo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 11-20493
Document: 00511824521
Page: 2
Date Filed: 04/17/2012
No. 11-20493
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?