USA v. Hermelindo Segundo


UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [11-20493 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: EHJ , Judge: EGJ , Judge: JES Mandate pull date is 05/08/2012 for Appellant Hermelindo Segundo; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Timothy William Crooks [6961689-2] [11-20493]

Download PDF
Case: 11-20493 Document: 00511824521 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/17/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED No. 11-20493 Conference Calendar April 17, 2012 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. HERMELINDO SEGUNDO, also known as Hermelindo Melo Segundo, also known as Hermelindo Melo Marquez Segundo, also known as Hermelindo Melo Marq Segundo, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:11-CR-94-1 Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Hermelindo Segundo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Segundo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 11-20493 Document: 00511824521 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/17/2012 No. 11-20493 counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?