USA v. Juan Flore

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [11-20598 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: JES , Judge: JWE , Judge: LHS Mandate pull date is 09/11/2012 for Appellant Juan Carlos Garcia Flores; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Ms. Lourdes Rodriguez [7037258-2] [11-20598]

Download PDF
Case: 11-20598 Document: 00511963851 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/21/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED No. 11-20598 Conference Calendar August 21, 2012 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JUAN CARLOS GARCIA FLORES, also known as Carlos Flores Garcia, also known as Carlos Garcia, also known as Juan Carlos Garcia-Flores, also known as Juan Carlos Garcia, also known as Juan C. Garcia Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:11-CV-198-1 Before SMITH, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Juan Carlos Garcia Flores has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia Flores has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 11-20598 Document: 00511963851 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/21/2012 No. 11-20598 counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?