USA v. Edgar Saldivar
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [11-20728 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: JES , Judge: JWE , Judge: LHS Mandate pull date is 09/11/2012 for Appellant Edgar Eluit Lezama Saldivar; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Kenneth W. McGuire, Esq. [7065538-2] [11-20728]
Case: 11-20728
Document: 00511964177
Page: 1
Date Filed: 08/21/2012
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Fifth Circuit
FILED
No. 11-20728
Conference Calendar
August 21, 2012
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
EDGAR ELUIT LEZAMA SALDIVAR, also known as Edgar Eliud Saldivar
Lezama, also known as Edgar Eliud Lezama-Saldivar, also known as Edgar
Eliud Lezama Saldivar, also known as Edgar Eliut Lezama-Saldivar, also known
as Edgar E. Lezama-Saldivar,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:11-CR-23-1
Before SMITH, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Edgar Eluit Lezama Saldivar has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Lezama Saldivar has not filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 11-20728
Document: 00511964177
Page: 2
Date Filed: 08/21/2012
No. 11-20728
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue
for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?