USA v. Jose Lopez-Rodriguez


UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [11-40097 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: PEH , Judge: EBC , Judge: JWE Mandate pull date is 09/06/2011 for Appellant Jose Luis Lopez-Rodriguez; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. H. Michael Sokolow [6802456-2] [11-40097]

Download PDF
Case: 11-40097 Document: 00511573848 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/16/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED No. 11-40097 Conference Calendar August 16, 2011 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE LUIS LOPEZ-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:10-CR-1360-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, CLEMENT, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Luis LopezRodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lopez-Rodriguez has filed a response in which he does not object to counsel’s motion. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Lopez-Rodriguez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 11-40097 Document: 00511573848 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/16/2011 No. 11-40097 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?