Antwon Parker v. David Fortner, et al

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [11-40188 Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction] Judge: JES , Judge: RHB , Judge: LHS. Mandate pull date is 09/29/2011 [11-40188]

Download PDF
Case: 11-40188 Document: 00511595980 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/08/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED No. 11-40188 Summary Calendar September 8, 2011 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk ANTWON PARKER, Plaintiff - Appellant v. JEANIE ALLISON; AMY JONES; PATRICK COOPER; NEAL WEB; MICHAEL SIZEMORE, Defendants - Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:10-CV-296 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, Antwon Parker, Texas prisoner # 1311517, appeals from the dismissal of five of the nine defendants to his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil-rights action. Our jurisdiction is limited to appeals from “final decisions of the district courts”. 28 U.S.C. § 1291. “[A]ny decision that adjudicates the liability of fewer than all the parties does not terminate the action unless the district court (1) expressly determines that there is no just * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 11-40188 Document: 00511595980 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/08/2011 No. 11-40188 reason for delay and (2) expressly directs the entry of judgment”. Thompson v. Betts, 754 F.2d 1243, 1245 (5th Cir. 1985) (citing FED. R. CIV. P. 54(b)). The district court’s order did not dispose of Parker’s claims against all defendants and did not provide for an appeal under Rule 54(b). Accordingly, that order is not a final judgment; and, therefore, our court lacks jurisdiction to consider the instant appeal. DISMISSED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?