Ramon Morales-Corbala v. USA, et al
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [11-50704 Affirmed ] Judge: TMR , Judge: EGJ , Judge: WED Mandate pull date is 01/22/2013; denying motion to expedite appeal filed by Appellant Mr. Ramon Daniel Morales-Corbala [7069540-2]; denying motion for summary affirmance filed by Appellant Mr. Ramon Daniel Morales-Corbala [7069540-3] [11-50704]
Case: 11-50704
Document: 00512067972
Page: 1
Date Filed: 11/29/2012
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Fifth Circuit
FILED
No. 11-50704
Summary Calendar
November 29, 2012
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
RAMON DANIEL MORALES-CORBALA,
Petitioner-Appellant
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; WARDEN, REEVES COUNTY DETENTION
CENTER III; BUREAU OF PRISONS; GEO GROUP,
Respondents-Appellees
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 4:11-CV-25
Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Ramon Daniel Morales-Corbala, federal prisoner # 52818-208, an alien
against whom the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement has issued
a detainer subjecting him to immediate removal from the United States upon
release from Bureau of Prisons (BOP) custody, appeals the denial of his 28
U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging the BOP’s exclusion of him from
rehabilitation programs and halfway houses. The petition is foreclosed by this
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 11-50704
Document: 00512067972
Page: 2
Date Filed: 11/29/2012
No. 11-50704
court’s decision in Gallegos-Hernandez v. United States, 688 F.3d 190, 192-93
(5th Cir. 2012), petition for cert. filed (Sept. 14, 2012) (No. 12-6450). MoralesCorbala’s motion to expedite the appeal or for summary affirmance is denied.
AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?