Ramon Morales-Corbala v. USA, et al


UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [11-50704 Affirmed ] Judge: TMR , Judge: EGJ , Judge: WED Mandate pull date is 01/22/2013; denying motion to expedite appeal filed by Appellant Mr. Ramon Daniel Morales-Corbala [7069540-2]; denying motion for summary affirmance filed by Appellant Mr. Ramon Daniel Morales-Corbala [7069540-3] [11-50704]

Download PDF
Case: 11-50704 Document: 00512067972 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/29/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED No. 11-50704 Summary Calendar November 29, 2012 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk RAMON DANIEL MORALES-CORBALA, Petitioner-Appellant v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; WARDEN, REEVES COUNTY DETENTION CENTER III; BUREAU OF PRISONS; GEO GROUP, Respondents-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:11-CV-25 Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Ramon Daniel Morales-Corbala, federal prisoner # 52818-208, an alien against whom the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement has issued a detainer subjecting him to immediate removal from the United States upon release from Bureau of Prisons (BOP) custody, appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging the BOP’s exclusion of him from rehabilitation programs and halfway houses. The petition is foreclosed by this * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 11-50704 Document: 00512067972 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/29/2012 No. 11-50704 court’s decision in Gallegos-Hernandez v. United States, 688 F.3d 190, 192-93 (5th Cir. 2012), petition for cert. filed (Sept. 14, 2012) (No. 12-6450). MoralesCorbala’s motion to expedite the appeal or for summary affirmance is denied. AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?