USA v. Wilbert West


UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [12-30391 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: CDK , Judge: EBC , Judge: CH Mandate pull date is 03/12/2013 for Appellant Wilbert West; denying motion to appoint counsel filed by Appellant Mr. Wilbert West [7144874-3]; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Ms. Shelley A. Goff, Esq. [7136113-2] [12-30391]

Download PDF
Case: 12-30391 Document: 00512146599 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/19/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED No. 12-30391 Conference Calendar February 19, 2013 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. WILBERT WEST, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:11-CR-99-1 Before KING, CLEMENT, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Wilbert West has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). West has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as West’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 12-30391 Document: 00512146599 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/19/2013 No. 12-30391 counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. West’s motion for the appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?