USA v. Wilbert West
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [12-30391 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: CDK , Judge: EBC , Judge: CH Mandate pull date is 03/12/2013 for Appellant Wilbert West; denying motion to appoint counsel filed by Appellant Mr. Wilbert West [7144874-3]; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Ms. Shelley A. Goff, Esq. [7136113-2] [12-30391]
Case: 12-30391
Document: 00512146599
Page: 1
Date Filed: 02/19/2013
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Fifth Circuit
FILED
No. 12-30391
Conference Calendar
February 19, 2013
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
WILBERT WEST,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Louisiana
USDC No. 3:11-CR-99-1
Before KING, CLEMENT, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Wilbert West has moved for leave to
withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). West has
filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of
the record reflected therein, as well as West’s response.
We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 12-30391
Document: 00512146599
Page: 2
Date Filed: 02/19/2013
No. 12-30391
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. West’s motion for the appointment of
substitute counsel is DENIED.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?