USA v. David Manuel

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [12-40683 Dismissed as Frivolous 12-40704 Dismissed as Frivolous ] Judge: JLW , Judge: JWE , Judge: JEG Mandate pull date is 03/22/2013 for Appellant David Glenn Manuel; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Gary R. Bonneaux [7225320-2] [12-40683, 12-40704]

Download PDF
Case: 12-40683 Document: 00512161646 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/01/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED No. 12-40683 c/w No. 12-40704 Summary Calendar March 1, 2013 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. DAVID GLENN MANUEL, also known as Sealed 1, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:11-CR-102-1 USDC No. 1:11-CR-55-1 Before WIENER, ELROD, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent David Glenn Manuel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Manuel has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 12-40683 Document: 00512161646 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/01/2013 No. 12-40683 c/w No. 12-40704 counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?