Ralph Janvey, et al v. James Alguire, et al


PUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [13-10266 Affirmed 13-10272 Affirmed 13-10276 Affirmed 13-10279 Affirmed ] Judge: PEH , Judge: EBC , Judge: SAH Mandate pull date is 10/02/2014 [13-10266, 13-10272, 13-10276, 13-10279]

Download PDF
Case: 13-10266 Document: 00512765908 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/11/2014 United States Court of Appeals FIFTH CIRCUIT OFFICE OF THE CLERK LYLE W. CAYCE CLERK TEL. 504-310-7700 600 S. MAESTRI PLACE NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130 September 11, 2014 MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL OR PARTIES LISTED BELOW Regarding: Fifth Circuit Statement on Petitions for Rehearing or Rehearing En Banc No. 13-10266 13-10272 13-10276 13-10279 Ralph Janvey v. Alguire Ralph Janvey v. Venger Ralph Janvey v. Dokken Ralph Janvey v. Fernandez USDC No. 3:09-CV-724 --------------------------------------------------Enclosed is a copy of the court's decision. The court has entered judgment under FED R. APP. P. 36. (However, the opinion may yet contain typographical or printing errors which are subject to correction.) FED R. APP. P. 39 through 41, and 5TH Cir. R.s 35, 39, and 41 govern costs, rehearings, and mandates. 5TH Cir. R.s 35 and 40 require you to attach to your petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc an unmarked copy of the court's opinion or order. Please read carefully the Internal Operating Procedures (IOP's) following FED R. APP. P. 40 and 5TH CIR. R. 35 for a discussion of when a rehearing may be appropriate, the legal standards applied and sanctions which may be imposed if you make a nonmeritorious petition for rehearing en banc. Direct Criminal Appeals. 5TH CIR. R. 41 provides that a motion for a stay of mandate under FED R. APP. P. 41 will not be granted simply upon request. The petition must set forth good cause for a stay or clearly demonstrate that a substantial question will be presented to the Supreme Court. Otherwise, this court may deny the motion and issue the mandate immediately. Pro Se Cases. If you were unsuccessful in the district court and/or on appeal, and are considering filing a petition for certiorari in the United States Supreme Court, you do not need to file a motion for stay of mandate under FED R. APP. P. 41. The issuance of the mandate does not affect the time, or your right, to file with the Supreme Court. The judgment entered provides that each party bear its own costs on appeal. Case: 13-10266 Document: 00512765908 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/11/2014 Sincerely, LYLE W. CAYCE, Clerk By: _______________________ Joseph M. Armato, Deputy Clerk Enclosure(s) Mr. Mr. Mr. Ms. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Ms. Mr. Mr. Ms. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Ms. Ms. David Arlington Mark Joseph Barrera Monroe David Bryant Jr. Stephanie Frederique Cagniart Mark T. Davenport Thomas Leonard David Bill E. Davidoff Timothy Stuart Durst Charles Malcolm Gordon Jr. Ben L. Krage Lisa Ann Lee George G. Mahfood Eduardo Najera Jennifer Najera Andrew J. Petrie Scott Daniel Powers Phillip W. Preis Kevin M. Sadler Michael E. Staid David Topp Dora Topp Risia Topp Wine

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?