Ralph Janvey, et al v. James Alguire, et al
PUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [13-10266 Affirmed 13-10272 Affirmed 13-10276 Affirmed 13-10279 Affirmed ] Judge: PEH , Judge: EBC , Judge: SAH Mandate pull date is 10/02/2014 [13-10266, 13-10272, 13-10276, 13-10279]
Date Filed: 09/11/2014
United States Court of Appeals
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
LYLE W. CAYCE
600 S. MAESTRI PLACE
NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130
September 11, 2014
MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL OR PARTIES LISTED BELOW
Fifth Circuit Statement on Petitions for Rehearing
or Rehearing En Banc
Ralph Janvey v. Alguire
Ralph Janvey v. Venger
Ralph Janvey v. Dokken
Ralph Janvey v. Fernandez
USDC No. 3:09-CV-724
--------------------------------------------------Enclosed is a copy of the court's decision. The court has entered
judgment under FED R. APP. P. 36. (However, the opinion may yet
contain typographical or printing errors which are subject to
FED R. APP. P. 39 through 41, and 5TH Cir. R.s 35, 39, and 41 govern
costs, rehearings, and mandates. 5TH Cir. R.s 35 and 40 require
you to attach to your petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en
banc an unmarked copy of the court's opinion or order.
read carefully the Internal Operating Procedures (IOP's) following
FED R. APP. P. 40 and 5TH CIR. R. 35 for a discussion of when a
rehearing may be appropriate, the legal standards applied and
sanctions which may be imposed if you make a nonmeritorious
petition for rehearing en banc.
Direct Criminal Appeals. 5TH CIR. R. 41 provides that a motion for
a stay of mandate under FED R. APP. P. 41 will not be granted simply
upon request. The petition must set forth good cause for a stay
or clearly demonstrate that a substantial question will be
presented to the Supreme Court. Otherwise, this court may deny
the motion and issue the mandate immediately.
Pro Se Cases.
If you were unsuccessful in the district court
and/or on appeal, and are considering filing a petition for
certiorari in the United States Supreme Court, you do not need to
file a motion for stay of mandate under FED R. APP. P. 41. The
issuance of the mandate does not affect the time, or your right,
to file with the Supreme Court.
The judgment entered provides that each party bear its own costs
Date Filed: 09/11/2014
LYLE W. CAYCE, Clerk
Joseph M. Armato, Deputy Clerk
Mark Joseph Barrera
Monroe David Bryant Jr.
Stephanie Frederique Cagniart
Mark T. Davenport
Thomas Leonard David
Bill E. Davidoff
Timothy Stuart Durst
Charles Malcolm Gordon Jr.
Ben L. Krage
Lisa Ann Lee
George G. Mahfood
Andrew J. Petrie
Scott Daniel Powers
Phillip W. Preis
Kevin M. Sadler
Michael E. Staid
Risia Topp Wine
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?