USA v. Noe Garcia
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [13-10423 Dismissed as frivolous] Judge: TMR , Judge: PRO , Judge: LHS Mandate pull date is 03/14/2014 for Appellant Noe Rangel Garcia; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Jason Douglas Hawkins [7449962-2] [13-10423]
Case: 13-10423
Document: 00512540210
Page: 1
Date Filed: 02/21/2014
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-10423
Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
February 21, 2014
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
v.
NOE RANGEL GARCIA,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:12-CR-176-1
Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Noe Rangel Garcia
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rangel Garcia has filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well
as Rangel Garcia’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 13-10423
Document: 00512540210
Page: 2
Date Filed: 02/21/2014
No. 13-10423
appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?