USA v. Christopher Tucker

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [13-10649 Dismissed as Frivolous13-10666 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: WED , Judge: EBC , Judge: GJC Mandate pull date is 12/09/2014 for Appellant Christopher Jerome Tucker; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Jason Douglas Hawkins [7544765-2] [13-10666, 13-10649]

Download PDF
Case: 13-10666 Document: 00512840327 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/18/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 13-10666 c/w No. 13-10649 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 18, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. CHRISTOPHER JEROME TUCKER, also known as Christopher L. Tucker, Defendant-Appellant ----------------------------------------UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. CHRISTOPHER JEROME TUCKER, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:00-CR-169 Before DAVIS, CLEMENT and COSTA, Circuit Judges. Case: 13-10666 Document: 00512840327 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/18/2014 No. 13-10666 c/w No. 13-10649 PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Christopher Jerome Tucker has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Tucker has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?