USA v. Eustacio Maldonado
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [13-20173 Dismissed in part as frivolous and Dismissed in part as moot] Judge: TMR , Judge: PRO , Judge: LHS Mandate pull date is 03/14/2014 for Appellant Eustacio Cabrera Maldonado; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Ms. Lourdes Rodriguez [7428590-2] [13-20173]
Case: 13-20173
Document: 00512540389
Page: 1
Date Filed: 02/21/2014
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-20173
Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
February 21, 2014
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
v.
EUSTACIO CABRERA MALDONADO, also known as Eustacio Maldonado,
also known as Eustaciocabrera Maldonado,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:12-CR-726-1
Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Eustacio Cabrera Maldonado has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Maldonado has not filed a response and has been removed from the
United States. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 13-20173
Document: 00512540389
Page: 2
Date Filed: 02/21/2014
No. 13-20173
the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as
frivolous, see 5TH CIR. R. 42.2, and in part as moot. See United States v.
Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 382-83 (5th Cir. 2007).
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?