USA v. Artemio Hernandez
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [13-20556 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: EGJ , Judge: ECP , Judge: CH Mandate pull date is 09/05/2014 for Appellant Artemio Castene Hernandez; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Ms. Margaret Christina Ling [7574369-2] [13-20556]
Case: 13-20556
Document: 00512735336
Page: 1
Date Filed: 08/15/2014
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Fifth Circuit
FILED
No. 13-20556
Summary Calendar
August 15, 2014
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
ARTEMIO CASTENE HERNANDEZ, also known as Artemio Casteneda
Hernandez, also known as Aldredo C. Hernandez, also known as Artemio C.
Hernandez, also known as Aldredo Hernandez Casteneda, also known as
Artemio Hernandez Costa,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:12-CR-537-1
Before JOLLY, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Artemio Castene
Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Castene Hernandez has not filed a response. We
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 13-20556
Document: 00512735336
Page: 2
Date Filed: 08/15/2014
No. 13-20556
have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?