USA v. Joseph Smith
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [13-31069 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: JLW , Judge: PRO , Judge: CH Mandate pull date is 07/23/2014 for Appellant Joseph Smith; denying motion to appoint counsel filed by Appellant Mr. Joseph Smith [7591075-2]; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Dane S. Ciolino [7583657-2] [13-31069]
Case: 13-31069
Document: 00512685345
Page: 1
Date Filed: 07/02/2014
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-31069
Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
July 2, 2014
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JOSEPH SMITH,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana
USDC No. 2:04-CR-17-3
Before WIENER, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Joseph Smith has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Smith has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant
portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Smith’s response. We concur
with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 13-31069
Document: 00512685345
Page: 2
Date Filed: 07/02/2014
No. 13-31069
appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, and counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein.
Smith’s motion for the appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED. See
United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998). The APPEAL
IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?