USA v. Joseph Smith

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [13-31069 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: JLW , Judge: PRO , Judge: CH Mandate pull date is 07/23/2014 for Appellant Joseph Smith; denying motion to appoint counsel filed by Appellant Mr. Joseph Smith [7591075-2]; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Dane S. Ciolino [7583657-2] [13-31069]

Download PDF
Case: 13-31069 Document: 00512685345 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/02/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 13-31069 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED July 2, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSEPH SMITH, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:04-CR-17-3 Before WIENER, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Joseph Smith has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Smith has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Smith’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 13-31069 Document: 00512685345 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/02/2014 No. 13-31069 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, and counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein. Smith’s motion for the appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998). The APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?