USA v. Jose Ramo

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [14-10699 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: WED , Judge: JWE , Judge: GJC Mandate pull date is 03/17/2015 for Appellant Jose Luis Ramos; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Mark R. Danielson [7732110-2] [14-10699]

Download PDF
Case: 14-10699 Document: 00512946029 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/24/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 14-10699 Conference Calendar FILED February 24, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE LUIS RAMOS, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13-CR-212-1 Before DAVIS, ELROD, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Jose Luis Ramos has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ramos has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 14-10699 Document: 00512946029 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/24/2015 No. 14-10699 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?