USA v. Eric Jone

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [14-10769 Dismissed as moot] Judge: WED , Judge: EHJ , Judge: SAH Mandate pull date is 07/07/2015 for Appellant Eric Rashad Jones; denying, as unnecessary, motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. James Matthew Wright [7782008-2] [14-10769]

Download PDF
Case: 14-10769 Document: 00513079870 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/16/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 14-10769 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 16, 2015 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee Lyle W. Cayce Clerk v. ERIC RASHAD JONES, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:12-CR-165-1 Before DAVIS, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eric Rashad Jones has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Jones has not filed a response. During the pendency of this appeal, Jones completed the six-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release and was released from Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 14-10769 Document: 00513079870 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/16/2015 No. 14-10769 custody. Because no additional term of supervised release was imposed, the instant appeal is moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998); United States v. Clark, 193 F.3d 845, 847-48 (5th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED as moot, and counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is DENIED as unnecessary. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?