USA v. Alejandro Gaytan-Mirele


UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [14-20150 Dismissed as frivolous] Judge: TMR , Judge: JES , Judge: JEG Mandate pull date is 05/12/2015 for Appellant Alejandro Gaytan-Mireles; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Philip G. Gallagher [7790585-2] [14-20150]

Download PDF
Case: 14-20150 Document: 00513013137 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/21/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 14-20150 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 21, 2015 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee Lyle W. Cayce Clerk v. ALEJANDRO GAYTAN-MIRELES, also known as Alejandro Mirelles, also known as Alejandro Gaytan Mireles, also known as Alejandro Hernandez Mireles, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13-CR-357-1 Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alejandro GaytanMireles has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gaytan-Mireles has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 14-20150 Document: 00513013137 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/21/2015 No. 14-20150 therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?