Latisha Staten, et al v. Lex Special Assets, L.L.C., et al

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [14-20486 Affirmed] Judge: EGJ , Judge: SAH , Judge: GJC. Mandate pull date is 05/27/2015 [14-20486]

Case: 14-20486

Document: 00513032484

Page: 1

Date Filed: 05/06/2015

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-20486

United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit

FILED
LATISHA STATEN; ROBERT STATEN,
Plaintiffs - Appellants

May 6, 2015
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk

v.
LEX SPECIAL ASSETS, L.L.C.; LASALLE BANK, N.A.; MORTGAGE
ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED; PAMI,
L.L.C.; ROOSEVELT DEPOSITOR, L.L.C.; ROOSEVELT MANAGEMENT
COMPANY, L.L.C.; SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, L.L.C.; U.S. BANK,
N.A.; ROOSEVELT MORTGAGE ACQUISITION COMPANY,
Defendants - Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:12-CV-3406
Before JOLLY, HIGGINSON and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Plaintiffs Latisha and Robert Staten sued the above named defendants
based on the foreclosure sale of their property. The district court granted the
defendants’ motions to dismiss the Statens’ complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir.
R. 47.5.4.

Case: 14-20486

Document: 00513032484

Page: 2

Date Filed: 05/06/2015

No. 14-20486
This case is now before us on appeal. We have reviewed carefully the
complaint and incorporated attachments. We have considered the parties’
briefs. We find no reversible error in the proceedings before the district court,
and, consequently, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED in all
respects. See 5th Cir. R. 47.6.

2