USA v. Heliodoro Vela-Cavazo

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [14-20767 Affirmed ] Judge: EGJ , Judge: JEG , Judge: GJC Mandate pull date is 09/08/2015 for Appellant Heliodoro Vela-Cavazos; granting motion for summary affirmance filed by Appellant Mr. Heliodoro Vela-Cavazos [7904682-2] [14-20767]

Download PDF
Case: 14-20767 Document: 00513157857 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 14-20767 Conference Calendar FILED August 18, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. HELIODORO VELA-CAVAZOS, also known as Heliodoro Vela, also known as Eliodoro Vela, also known as Eliodoro Cavazos Vela, also known as Eliodoro Vela-Cavazos, also known as Helidoro Cavazos Vela, also known as Jose Vela, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:14-CR-285-1 Before JOLLY, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Heliodoro Vela-Cavazos raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Morales-Mota, 704 F.3d 410, 412 (5th Cir. 2013), which rejected the argument that the Texas offense of “burglary of a habitation” is broader than the generic, contemporary definition of “burglary of a dwelling” under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 14-20767 Document: 00513157857 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2015 No. 14-20767 because it defines the “owner” of a habitation as a person with a “greater right to possession of the property than the actor.” The motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?