Gopinath Gopalam v. Wendell Smith, et al

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [14-30196 Affirmed ] Judge: JES , Judge: JLW , Judge: JWE Mandate pull date is 08/07/2014 [14-30196]

Download PDF
Case: 14-30196 Document: 00512702368 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/17/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit No. 14-30196 Summary Calendar FILED July 17, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk GOPINATH GOPALAM, Plaintiff-Appellant v. WENDELL B. SMITH; DR. RAMA KONGARA; DR. LANCE E. BULLOCK; RICK BENNETT; OFFICER DAVID BREAUX; CHIEF SHERMAN JACKSON; CITY OF GONZALES, LOUISIANA; ST. JAMES BEHAVIORAL HEALTH HOSPITAL, INCORPORATED, Defendants-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:12-CV-542 Before SMITH, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Plaintiff-Appellant Gopinath Gopalam appeals (1) the district court’s summary judgment dismissal with prejudice of numerous federal claims asserted against public employees and entities and against private individuals, and (2) its dismissal without prejudice of claims that Gopalam asserted under Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 14-30196 Document: 00512702368 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/17/2014 No. 14-30196 state law. All claims arise from the termination of his employment at St. James Behavioral Hospital, Incorporated in Gonzales, Louisiana. We affirm. We have carefully reviewed the record on appeal, including the briefs of the parties and the district court’s Ruling on Defendant’s Motions for Summary Judgment of February 5, 2014. For the reasons patiently set forth by the district court in its said Ruling, detailing the law applicable to the relevant summary judgment facts, the judgment of that court is, in all respects, AFFIRMED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?