In Re: Deepwater Horizon


UNPUBLISHED OPINION ORDER FILED. [14-30400 Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction] Judge: WED , Judge: EBC , Judge: GJC; granting motion to dismiss appeal for lack of jurisdiction filed by Appellees BP Exploration & Production, Incorporated, BP America Production Company and BP, P.L.C. (Also filed in 14-30398) [7696710-2] [14-30400]

Download PDF
Case: 14-30400 Document: 00512745546 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/25/2014 United States Court of Appeals FIFTH CIRCUIT OFFICE OF THE CLERK LYLE W. CAYCE CLERK TEL. 504-310-7700 600 S. MAESTRI PLACE NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130 August 25, 2014 MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL OR PARTIES LISTED BELOW Regarding: Fifth Circuit Statement on Petitions for Rehearing or Rehearing En Banc No. 14-30400 In Re: Deepwater Horizon USDC No. 2:10-MD-2179 USDC No. 2:12-CV-970 --------------------------------------------------Enclosed is a copy of the court's decision. The court has entered judgment under FED R. APP. P. 36. (However, the opinion may yet contain typographical or printing errors which are subject to correction.) FED R. APP. P. 39 through 41, and 5TH CIR. R.s 35, 39, and 41 govern costs, rehearings, and mandates. 5TH CIR. R.s 35 and 40 require you to attach to your petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc an unmarked copy of the court's opinion or order. Please read carefully the Internal Operating Procedures (IOP's) following FED R. APP. P. 40 and 5TH CIR. R. 35 for a discussion of when a rehearing may be appropriate, the legal standards applied and sanctions which may be imposed if you make a nonmeritorious petition for rehearing en banc. Direct Criminal Appeals. 5TH CIR. R. 41 provides that a motion for a stay of mandate under FED R. APP. P. 41 will not be granted simply upon request. The petition must set forth good cause for a stay or clearly demonstrate that a substantial question will be presented to the Supreme Court. Otherwise, this court may deny the motion and issue the mandate immediately. Pro Se Cases. If you were unsuccessful in the district court and/or on appeal, and are considering filing a petition for certiorari in the United States Supreme Court, you do not need to file a motion for stay of mandate under FED R. APP. P. 41. The issuance of the mandate does not affect the time, or your right, to file with the Supreme Court. The judgment entered provides that appellants pay to appellees the costs on appeal. Case: 14-30400 Document: 00512745546 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/25/2014 Sincerely, LYLE W. CAYCE, Clerk By: _______________________ Jamei R. Cheramie, Deputy Clerk Enclosure(s) Mr. Matthew Ian David Andrews Mr. Robert C. Mike Brock Mr. George Howard Brown Mr. Jeffrey Bossert Clark Sr. Mrs. Martha Y. Curtis Mr. Dominic E. Draye Mr. Timothy A. Duffy Mr. Miguel Angel Estrada Mr. James M. Garner Mr. Richard Cartier Godfrey Mr. Don Keller Haycraft Mr. Thomas George Hungar Mr. James Andrew Langan Mr. Scott Payne Martin Mr. Kevin Michael McGlone Mr. Theodore B. Olson Mr. Elias John Saad

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?