Reid Zeising, et al v. Michael Shelton, et al
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [14-30958 Affirmed ] Judge: TMR , Judge: JES , Judge: JEG Mandate pull date is 05/05/2015 [14-30958]
Case: 14-30958
Document: 00513004474
Page: 1
Date Filed: 04/14/2015
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 14-30958
REID ZEISING; DIXIE RESTAURANT GROUP, L.L.C.,
FILED
April 14, 2015
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Plaintiffs - Appellants
v.
MICHAEL A. SHELTON; SHELTON RESTAURANT GROUP, L.L.C.,
Defendants - Appellees
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 1:12-CV-2614
Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The judgment of the district court is affirmed because an enforceable oral
contract was not mutually agreed upon by these parties. The acquisition,
purchase and terms, of the 29 Popeye’s restaurants, how they would be
operated and what – if any – consideration and role Zeising would contribute,
was left wide open. At best, it could be said only that they agreed to agree, but
that is not an enforceable contract under Louisiana or Georgia law.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 14-30958
Document: 00513004474
Page: 2
Date Filed: 04/14/2015
No. 14-30958
See McNeely v. Town of Vidalia, 102 So. 422, 423 (La. 1924); Moss v. Moss, 463
S.E.2d 9 (Ga. 1995). Likewise, Shelton did not have a contract with Dixie, nor
did he owe it a fiduciary duty. Ga. Code § 14-11-304(a).
AFFIRMED.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?