Whole Woman's Health, et al v. David Lakey, et al
Filing
PUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [14-50928 Affirmed in Part, Modified in Part, Vacated in Part, and Reversed in Part] Judge: ECP , Judge: JWE , Judge: CH Mandate pull date is 06/30/2015 [14-50928]
Case: 14-50928
Document: 00513071940
Page: 1
Date Filed: 06/09/2015
United States Court of Appeals
FIFTH CIRCUIT
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
LYLE W. CAYCE
CLERK
TEL. 504-310-7700
600 S. MAESTRI PLACE
NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130
June 09, 2015
MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL OR PARTIES LISTED BELOW
Regarding:
Fifth Circuit Statement on Petitions for Rehearing
or Rehearing En Banc
No. 14-50928
Whole Woman's Health, et al v. David Lakey,
et al
USDC No. 1:14-CV-284
--------------------------------------------------Enclosed is a copy of the court's decision. The court has entered
judgment under FED R. APP. P. 36. (However, the opinion may yet
contain typographical or printing errors which are subject to
correction.)
FED R. APP. P. 39 through 41, and 5TH CIR. R.s 35, 39, and 41 govern
costs, rehearings, and mandates. 5TH CIR. R.s 35 and 40 require
you to attach to your petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en
banc an unmarked copy of the court's opinion or order.
Please
read carefully the Internal Operating Procedures (IOP's) following
FED R. APP. P. 40 and 5TH CIR. R. 35 for a discussion of when a
rehearing may be appropriate, the legal standards applied and
sanctions which may be imposed if you make a nonmeritorious
petition for rehearing en banc.
Direct Criminal Appeals. 5TH CIR. R. 41 provides that a motion for
a stay of mandate under FED R. APP. P. 41 will not be granted simply
upon request. The petition must set forth good cause for a stay
or clearly demonstrate that a substantial question will be
presented to the Supreme Court. Otherwise, this court may deny
the motion and issue the mandate immediately.
Pro Se Cases.
If you were unsuccessful in the district court
and/or on appeal, and are considering filing a petition for
certiorari in the United States Supreme Court, you do not need to
file a motion for stay of mandate under FED R. APP. P. 41. The
issuance of the mandate does not affect the time, or your right,
to file with the Supreme Court.
The judgment entered provides that plaintiffs-appellees-crossappellants pay to defendants-appellants-cross-appellees the costs
on appeal.
Case: 14-50928
Document: 00513071940
Page: 2
Date Filed: 06/09/2015
Sincerely,
LYLE W. CAYCE, Clerk
By: _______________________
Debbie T. Graham, Deputy Clerk
Enclosure(s)
Mr. Steven H. Aden
Ms. Esha Bhandari
Mr. James Davis Blacklock
Mr. David Patrick Brown
Mr. Stephen Daniel Casey
Ms. Natalie Lynn Decker
Ms. Carrie Yvette Flaxman
Mrs. Catherine Glenn Foster
Ms. CeCe Heil
Mr. Lawrence John Joseph
Mr. Scott A. Keller
Ms. Beth Ellen Klusmann
Mr. Joseph Alexander Lawrence
Mr. Michael P. Murphy
Mr. Michael J. Norton
Mr. Patrick J. O'Connell
Mr. Andrew S. Oldham
Mr. Allan Edward Parker Jr.
Ms. Kimberly A. Parker
Mr. Stuart J. Roth
Mr. Jay A. Sekulow
Mrs. Catherine Wynne Short
Mrs. Mailee Rebecca Smith
Ms. Jan Soifer
Mr. Gregory R. Terra
Ms. Stephanie Toti
Mr. Walter Martin Weber
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?