USA v. Rosbel Flores-Vera

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [15-41600 Affirmed] Judge: CDK, Judge: JLD, Judge: GJC. Mandate pull date is 05/26/2017 for Appellant Rosbel Flores-Vera [15-41600]

Download PDF
Case: 15-41600 Document: 00513981044 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/05/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 15-41600 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 5, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ROSBEL FLORES-VERA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:15-CR-422-1 Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Rosbel Flores-Vera appeals the 84-month sentence imposed by the district court after his guilty plea conviction for being found in the United States illegally following a prior conviction for an aggravated felony. Relying upon Mathis v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 2243 (2016), he argues that the district court erred by imposing a U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) enhancement based upon his prior conviction under Texas Penal Code § 30.02(a)(1). Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 15-41600 Document: 00513981044 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/05/2017 No. 15-41600 We review the district court’s application of the Sentencing Guidelines de novo. See United States v. Cisneros-Gutierrez, 517 F.3d 751, 764 (5th Cir. 2008). We have previously held that § 30.02(a) is divisible under the modified categorical approach and that a § 30.02(a)(1) conviction supports a § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) enhancement. United States v. Conde-Castaneda, 753 F.3d 172, 176 (5th Cir. 2014). Contrary to Flores-Vera’s argument, Conde- Castaneda remains good law in the wake of Mathis. See United States v. Uribe, 838 F.3d 667, 669-71 (5th Cir. 2016), cert. denied, 2017 WL 661924 (Mar. 20, 2017) (No. 16-7969). AFFIRMED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?