USA v. Federico Gomez-Cruz


UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [15-51157 Dismissed as Frivolous 15-51165 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: PEH, Judge: ECP, Judge: CH. Mandate pull date is 03/16/2017 for Appellant Federico Gomez-Cruz; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Joe Anthony Rivera, Esq. [8187110-2] [15-51157, 15-51165]

Download PDF
Case: 15-51157 Document: 00513887979 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/23/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 15-51157 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 23, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Consolidated with Case No. 15-51165 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. FEDERICO GOMEZ-CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:15-CR-247-1 USDC No. 6:15-CR-155-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Federico Gomez-Cruz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 15-51157 Document: 00513887979 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/23/2017 No. 15-51157 Cons w/ No. 15-51165 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gomez-Cruz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?