USA v. Federico Gomez-Cruz
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [15-51157 Dismissed as Frivolous 15-51165 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: PEH, Judge: ECP, Judge: CH. Mandate pull date is 03/16/2017 for Appellant Federico Gomez-Cruz; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Joe Anthony Rivera, Esq. [8187110-2] [15-51157, 15-51165]
Case: 15-51157
Document: 00513887979
Page: 1
Date Filed: 02/23/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-51157
Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
February 23, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Consolidated with
Case No. 15-51165
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
FEDERICO GOMEZ-CRUZ,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 6:15-CR-247-1
USDC No. 6:15-CR-155-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Federico Gomez-Cruz has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 15-51157
Document: 00513887979
Page: 2
Date Filed: 02/23/2017
No. 15-51157
Cons w/ No. 15-51165
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Gomez-Cruz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and
the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEALS ARE
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?