Charles Stephens v. Loretta Lynch
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [15-60910 Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction] Judge: PEH, Judge: ECP, Judge: CH. [15-60910]
Case: 15-60910
Document: 00513938174
Page: 1
Date Filed: 04/04/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-60910
Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
April 4, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
CHARLES STEPHENS,
Petitioner
v.
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondent
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
BIA No. A038 541 554
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Charles Stephens is a native of Guyana and citizen of the United
Kingdom who was ordered removed based on his commission of an aggravated
felony.
He petitions this court for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying as untimely his motion to reconsider or
reopen. He argues that the BIA erred by concluding that he was not entitled
to equitable tolling.
He further argues that his prior counsel rendered
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 15-60910
Document: 00513938174
Page: 2
Date Filed: 04/04/2017
No. 15-60910
ineffective assistance by not arguing that his offense did not involve more than
$10,000 because there is no indication that the district court made such a
finding. The record undermines this assertion, as it shows that the district
court adopted the presentence report, which found that the offense involved
more than $10,000.
Because Stephens was ordered removed based on his commission of an
aggravated felony, and because his arguments concerning equitable tolling and
ineffective assistance of counsel do not present substantial constitutional
claims, we lack jurisdiction.
See 8 U.S.C. ยง 1252(a)(2)(C), (D); Assaad v.
Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 471, 474-76 (5th Cir. 2004). The petition is, therefore,
DISMISSED.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?