USA v. Hau Nguyen
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-10004 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: EGJ, Judge: JES, Judge: JEG. Mandate pull date is 05/24/2017 for Appellant Hau Ngoc Nguyen; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Jerry Van Beard, Esq. [8394609-2] [16-10004]
Case: 16-10004
Document: 00513977345
Page: 1
Date Filed: 05/03/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 16-10004
Summary Calendar
FILED
May 3, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff–Appellee,
versus
HAU NGOC NGUYEN,
Defendant–Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:14-CR-219-1
Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Hau Ngoc Nguyen
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 16-10004
Document: 00513977345
Page: 2
Date Filed: 05/03/2017
No. 16-10004
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Nguyen has not filed a response.
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of the record. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?