USA v. Francisco Radamez-Nava

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-11366 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: EGJ , Judge: PEH , Judge: JWE Mandate pull date is 09/08/2017 for Appellant Francisco Manuel Radamez-Nava; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Matthew J. Kita [8421834-2] [16-11366]

Download PDF
Case: 16-11366 Document: 00514121377 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 16-11366 Conference Calendar FILED August 18, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. FRANCISCO MANUEL RADAMEZ-NAVA, also known as Ghost, true name Jose Antonio Salinas, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:14-CR-367-77 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Francisco Manuel Radamez-Nava has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Radamez-Nava has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 16-11366 Document: 00514121377 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2017 No. 16-11366 therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?