Mohammed Hossain v. Tracy Tarango, et al

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-11473 Affirmed ] Judge: EHJ , Judge: JLW , Judge: EBC Mandate pull date is 04/24/2017 [16-11473]

Download PDF
Case: 16-11473 Document: 00513895428 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/02/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 16-11473 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 2, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk MOHAMMED ZAHID HOSSAIN, Plaintiff-Appellant v. TRACY TARANGO, Field Office Director of the USCIS; JOHN F. KELLY, Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security; LEON RODRIGUEZ, Director United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; PARKER R. JOHN, the Acting US Attorney Northern District of Texas; JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. Attorney General, Defendants-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:15-CV-359 Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* After he was denied citizenship, Plaintiff-Appellant Mohammed Zahid Hossain sued Defendants-Appellees seeking to be declared a citizen of the United States of America. He had been denied citizenship through the Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 16-11473 Document: 00513895428 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/02/2017 No. 16-11473 administrative process for failure to prove that he has the good moral character required to become a citizen. After both sides filed competing motions for summary judgment, the district court denied Hossain’s motion, granted such motion for DefendantsAppellees, and dismissed Hossain’s claims with prejudice. For the detailed reasons patiently set forth in the district court’s Order of September 14, 2016, we affirm that court’s Final Judgment of even date, dismissing Hossain’s action with prejudice. AFFIRMED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?