Mohammed Hossain v. Tracy Tarango, et al
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-11473 Affirmed ] Judge: EHJ , Judge: JLW , Judge: EBC Mandate pull date is 04/24/2017 [16-11473]
Case: 16-11473
Document: 00513895428
Page: 1
Date Filed: 03/02/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-11473
Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
March 2, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
MOHAMMED ZAHID HOSSAIN,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
TRACY TARANGO, Field Office Director of the USCIS; JOHN F. KELLY,
Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security; LEON
RODRIGUEZ, Director United States Citizenship and Immigration Services;
PARKER R. JOHN, the Acting US Attorney Northern District of Texas;
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. Attorney General,
Defendants-Appellees
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:15-CV-359
Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
After he was denied citizenship, Plaintiff-Appellant Mohammed Zahid
Hossain sued Defendants-Appellees seeking to be declared a citizen of the
United States of America. He had been denied citizenship through the
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 16-11473
Document: 00513895428
Page: 2
Date Filed: 03/02/2017
No. 16-11473
administrative process for failure to prove that he has the good moral
character required to become a citizen.
After both sides filed competing motions for summary judgment, the
district court denied Hossain’s motion, granted such motion for DefendantsAppellees, and dismissed Hossain’s claims with prejudice. For the detailed
reasons patiently set forth in the district court’s Order of September 14, 2016,
we affirm that court’s Final Judgment of even date, dismissing Hossain’s
action with prejudice.
AFFIRMED.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?