USA v. James William

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-11567 Affirmed ] Judge: PEH , Judge: ECP , Judge: CH Mandate pull date is 06/20/2017 for Appellant James Paris Williams; granting motion for summary affirmance filed by Appellee USA [8422362-2]; denying motion to extend time to file appellee's brief filed by Appellee USA [8422362-3] [16-11567]

Case: 16-11567

Document: 00514011933

Page: 1

Date Filed: 05/30/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-11567
Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit

FILED
May 30, 2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee

Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk

v.
JAMES PARIS WILLIAMS,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:16-CR-18-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, James Paris Williams raises
arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Alcantar, 733 F.3d 143, 14546 (5th Cir. 2013), and United States v. Trejo, 610 F3d 308, 312-13 (5th Cir.
2010). In Alcantar, we rejected the argument that Nat’l Fed’n of Indep. Bus.
v. Sebelius, 132 S. Ct. 2566 (2012), affected our prior jurisprudence rejecting
challenges to the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). 733 F.3d at 146. In

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*

Case: 16-11567

Document: 00514011933

Page: 2

Date Filed: 05/30/2017

No. 16-11567
Trejo, we applied the plain error standard to a factual sufficiency claim that
was raised for the first time in this court. 610 F.3d at 313.
Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is
GRANTED, its alternative motion for extension of time is DENIED, and the
judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2