USA v. Julio Arias-Barron

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-20162 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: JES , Judge: EBC , Judge: GJC. Mandate pull date is 07/11/2017 for Appellant Julio Alejandro Arias-Barron; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Michael Lance Herman [8223939-2] [16-20162]

Download PDF
Case: 16-20162 Document: 00514041166 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/20/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 16-20162 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 20, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JULIO ALEJANDRO ARIAS-BARRON, also known as Julio Alejandro Arias Barron, also known as Julio Arias-Barron, also known as Alejandro GomezBarron, also known as Julio Alejandro Arias, also known as Alejandro Arias, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:15-CR-601-1 Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Julio Alejandro Arias-Barron has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Arias-Barron has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 16-20162 Document: 00514041166 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/20/2017 No. 16-20162 reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?