USA v. Agusto Lazo-Aguirre

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-20467 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: JLW , Judge: JLD , Judge: LHS Mandate issue date is 12/27/2017 for Appellant Agusto Lazo-Aguirre; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Evan Gray Howze [8498731-2] [16-20467]

Case: 16-20467

Document: 00514261158

Page: 1

Date Filed: 12/05/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-20467
Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals
Fif h Circuit

FILED
December 5, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.

AGUSTO LAZO-AGUIRRE, also known as Natividad Aparic Aguirre, also
known as Agusto Lazo Aguire, also known as Juan J. Perez, also known as
Natividad A. Aguirre, also known as Natividad A. Aparicio, also known as Jose
O. Pineda, also known as Aguirre Natividad, also known as Natividad AguirreAparicio, also known as Brigido Aparicio, also known as Agusto Brigido
Aparicio,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:16-CR-101-1
Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Agusto LazoAguirre has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*

Case: 16-20467

Document: 00514261158

Page: 2

Date Filed: 12/05/2017

No. 16-20467
F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lazo-Aguirre has not filed a response. We have
reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected
therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2