USA v. Luis Ramirez Castillo

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-20737 Affirmed] Judge: WED, Judge: LHS, Judge: SAH. Mandate pull date is 05/26/2017 for Appellant Luis Roberto Ramirez Castillo; granting motion for summary affirmance filed by Appellant Mr. Luis Roberto Ramirez Castillo [8418977-2] [16-20737]

Case: 16-20737

Document: 00513981399

Page: 1

Date Filed: 05/05/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-20737
Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit

FILED
May 5, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.

LUIS ROBERTO RAMIREZ CASTILLO, also known as Luis Roberto Ramirez,
also known as Luis Roberto Ramirez-Castillo,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:16-CR-177-1
Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Luis Roberto Ramirez
Castillo raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. RodriguezSalazar, 768 F.3d 437, 437-38 (5th Cir. 2014). In Rodriguez-Salazar, 768 F.3d
at 437-38, we rejected the argument that the Texas offense of theft is broader
than the generic, contemporary definition of theft because the Texas offense,

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*

Case: 16-20737

Document: 00513981399

Page: 2

Date Filed: 05/05/2017

No. 16-20737
which includes theft by deception, may be committed by taking property with
the owner’s consent.

Accordingly, the motion for summary disposition is

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2