USA v. Richard White
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-20810 Affirmed ] Judge: EGJ , Judge: PRO , Judge: CH Mandate issue date is 12/05/2017 for Appellant Richard James White [16-20810]
Case: 16-20810
Document: 00514233890
Page: 1
Date Filed: 11/13/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-20810
Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fif h Circuit
FILED
November 13, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
RICHARD JAMES WHITE,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:13-CR-597-49
Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Richard James White appeals his conditional guilty plea conviction of
possession with intent to distribute 50 kilograms or more of marijuana for
which he was sentenced to 18 months of imprisonment and three years of
supervised release.
He appeals the denial of his motion to suppress the
marijuana discovered by law enforcement at an immigration checkpoint.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 16-20810
Document: 00514233890
Page: 2
Date Filed: 11/13/2017
No. 16-20810
The district court did not err in denying White’s motion to suppress. See
United States v. Jaime, 473 F.3d 178, 181 (5th Cir. 2006). White’s detention
in the primary inspection lane was within the permissible duration of an
immigration checkpoint stop. See United States v. Machuca-Barrera, 261 F.3d
425, 431-35 (5th Cir. 2001). The dog’s alerts provided probable cause for a
warrantless search of the tractor-trailer’s spare tire. See United States v.
Dovali-Avila, 895 F.2d 206, 207-09 (5th Cir. 1990). Accordingly, we do not need
to address White’s alternative argument that the search of the spare tire
exceeded the scope of his consent.
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?