USA v. Luis Pineda-Urquia

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-40042 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: EGJ, Judge: JES, Judge: JEG. Mandate pull date is 06/20/2017 for Appellant Luis Alonso Pineda-Urquia; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Philip G. Gallagher [8172019-2] [16-40042]

Download PDF
Case: 16-40042 Document: 00514010779 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/30/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 16-40042 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 30, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. LUIS ALONSO PINEDA-URQUIA, also known as Luis Alonso PinedaUrquilla, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:15-CR-802-1 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Luis Alonso PinedaUrquia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed original and supplemental briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). PinedaUrquia has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 16-40042 Document: 00514010779 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/30/2017 No. 16-40042 relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?