USA v. Ramon Saldierna-Roja


UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-40052 Affirmed] Judge: EHJ, Judge: JLW, Judge: EBC. Mandate pull date is 01/17/2017 for Appellant Ramon Onato Saldierna-Rojas; granting motion for summary affirmance filed by Appellant Mr. Ramon Onato Saldierna-Rojas [8313867-2] [16-40052]

Download PDF
Case: 16-40052 Document: 00513813222 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/27/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 16-40052 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 27, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. RAMON ONATO SALDIERNA-ROJAS, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:15-CR-598-1 Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ramon Onato Saldierna-Rojas appeals the sentence imposed on his conviction for being an alien found unlawfully in the United States after having been deported following an aggravated felony conviction. Saldierna-Rojas contends that the district court committed reversible error in determining that his 2003 Georgia conviction for aggravated assault constituted a crime of violence for purposes of the enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii). Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 16-40052 Document: 00513813222 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/27/2016 No. 16-40052 As conceded by Saldierna-Rojas in his motion for summary disposition, his challenge is foreclosed by United States v. Torres-Jaime, 821 F.3d 577, 582-85 (5th Cir. 2016), petition for cert. filed (Sept. 1, 2016) (No. 16-5853). Saldierna-Rojas’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?