USA v. Esvin Vasquez-Sanchez

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-40306 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: JLD , Judge: ECP , Judge: PRO. Mandate pull date is 01/10/2017 for Appellant Esvin Danilo Vasquez-Sanchez; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Philip G. Gallagher [8210844-2] [16-40306]

Download PDF
Case: 16-40306 Document: 00513804924 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 16-40306 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 20, 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee Lyle W. Cayce Clerk v. ESVIN DANILO VASQUEZ-SANCHEZ, also known as Rodemilio VasquezSanchez, also known as Marvin Danilo Vasquez-Sanchez, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:15-CR-877-1 Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Esvin Danilo Vasquez-Sanchez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Vasquez-Sanchez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 16-40306 Document: 00513804924 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2016 No. 16-40306 record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?