USA v. Pablo Ortiz-Rio

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-41153 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: CDK, Judge: CH, Judge: JEG. Mandate pull date is 05/09/2017 for Appellant Pablo Ortiz-Rios; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Scott Andrew Martin [8367349-2] [16-41153]

Download PDF
Case: 16-41153 Document: 00513956198 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/18/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 16-41153 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 18, 2017 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee Lyle W. Cayce Clerk v. PABLO ORTIZ-RIOS, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:16-CR-267-1 Before KING, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Pablo Ortiz-Rios has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ortiz-Rios has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 16-41153 Document: 00513956198 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/18/2017 No. 16-41153 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?